A visit from the Dogpatch!

February 28th, 2010

Michele Swiggers and Robin Gold of San Francisco’s Dogpatch Biofuels came to visit the plant a few days ago.

These two started Dogpatch in San Francisco as a B100 filling station.

We get a lot of visitors to the plant nowadays, but I was particularly happy to see these two industry heroines. We spoke a bit about the consequences of the credit expiration, how are tanks have never been filled to capacity, the IRS, and their planned journey to the desert.

Dogpatch Biofuels is a dedicated biodiesel fueling stop, with an 8,000 gallon above ground tank and a retail pump. They also sell Eco-conscious beverages and snacks, as well as fuel additives.

If you have a chance to go out and support these two please do so. I know for my next visit to San Francisco a stop at their little corner of heaven will be a must.

Make it a better place,

Todd

Producers must re-register plants under RFS2

February 28th, 2010

Buried in the middle of the RFS 2 regulations published in February by the EPA are the new requirements for producer program registration. The rules as posted are only the proposed modification to 40 CFR 80, pending publication of the final regulations in the Federal Register, a legal requirement for final adoption.

If you are not already aware, even if your facility was registered under the first version of RFS, it must re-register prior to July 1, 2010 to participate under the auspices of the new program.

The new producer registration requirements are detailed in a densely packed section of the 120 page document.

Occupying roughly four (4) pages, the requirements include a description of the type of fuels produced at the facility (or possibly produced with little modification to the production process),  feedstock used in the production process, the co-products produced with each fuel type,  and the submission by a state licensed, third party, chemical engineer the results of a careful review of your facility process and capacity expectation.

These requirements come at a time when producers are particularly sensitive to issues surrounding cash flow and operating costs, and expenses like a third-party engineering review may seem ill-timed.

RFS 2 participation is important to us here at Promethean. It is a personal initiative for me and I am focused on preparing us to meet the July start date.

There still exists a subset of mysteries whose answers are yet to be revealed by the EPA regarding what the EPA will specifically require as an ultimate demonstration of conformance.

I hope clarity is imminent.

Make it a better place,

Todd

Another bill fails, but we cannot afford to.

February 15th, 2010

It’s the middle of February 2010.  The tax credit expired in January. The powers that lobby have been searching for a legislative mechanism to make it retroactively effective.

The media has begun to report that a now spend-shy Obama administration is entering year two with the agenda of looking less agressive when it comes to deficit-building.

Time also seems to be supporting a sort of congressional priority-awareness when it comes to jobs creation.

The most recent effort to reinstate the biodiesel tax credit was embedded in the Hiring Employees to Restore Employment Act, or the HIRE Act for short.  This piece of legislation when authored by Senators Baucus (D-Mont) and Grassley (R-Iowa) looked to be an excellent bipartisan shot at reinstating the biodiesel industry’s much desired credit. But last week it was announced that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev) would move forward a version that removed the majority of tax credit inclusions, including the biodiesel tax credit. The reasons for this lack of support are currently the subject of intense speculation, but one possible reason put forward by Nicholas Zeman in his recent article for Biodiesel Magazine resonated with me.

Most biodiesel plants have been constructed to limit the number of employees required to operate them. A certain baseline is required to produce commercially and, after that, personnel requirements vary based on the level of plant atomation, oil collection and delivery receipt approach, testing requirements and equipment, continuous or batch operation, and access to capital. The latter means that no one can say if one job is generated per 1,000,000 gallons produced  or per $1,000,00 in revenue per year.  My personal experience indicates that neither is the case.

Mr. Zeman and his sources speculate that one possible reason is that the tax credit would do little to generate large numbers of new jobs at biodiesel plants, which have most likely been designed with efficiency and reduced need for labor. Of course, as I have said in prior posts in my opinion the credit does little to help the producer and serves primarily to support feedstock suppliers in the determination of a floor price for their product.

That said, it may serve to support farmers, and that may be an area Congress would be better served to consider, although farm jobs may not represent what is currently being considered as new jobs in the “green” energy sector.

It will take some time to introduce the credit extensions in another bill. It may be better if the credits are part of an entirely separate energy package.

What we all need to realize is that other countries are moving forward at lightning speed with their own biofuels programs. America has already given up its manufacturing dominance in many sectors. We cannot afford to let renewable energy be next.

We cannot afford to fail.

Make it a better place.

Todd

On biodiesel, feedstock, and production as a service.

February 8th, 2010

This week the National Biodiesel Boards annual conference will be held in Texas.

With last week’s release of the EPA’s final rules related to RFS 2, a biodiesel mandate will be in place this year.  I suppose a good deal of time will be spent discussing the mandate, the future of renewable identification numbers (RINS), and the current situation with the lapsed excise tax credit.

But whether or not a new mandate is in place or the excise tax credit returns, the core industry problem remains; feedstock.

The life blood of any biodiesel production plant is feedstock. Whatever the feedstock, be it virgin vegetable oil, yellow or brown grease, or animal tallow, in general it must be tracked and prepared for its future conversion to methyl esters.

Feedstock represents the majority of the cost of operation, and its secure and consistent acquisition is a daily challenge. Preparing the oil in a way that facilitates its consistent conversion requires the development and maturation of a carefully coordinated system of processes and practices that allow incoming oil to be collected, cataloged, tested, categorized, filtered, de-watered, neutralized, at times blended, and stored prior to processing.

Promethean is fortunate to have a relatively large facility space, but early  decisions made about our approach to storage has meant that the focus here is on high throughput.

It is easy to build excessive capacity in the biofuels arena and it is more important to conserve cash at startup than to spend it on potential future capacity. The issue here is that we have recently been approached by groups or organizations that want us to stretch the limits of our capacity. Although I am a proponent of service delivery based on just in time manufacture, in this industry issues related to transportation are relatively common, and it is best to have a cushion for problems that may arise from timing or the myriad other things that can interfere with the scheduled drop off of feedstock or pick up of finished product.

I am not conservative. I am a risk taker. The proof of the latter is my participation in this industry.

Feedstock prices in California remain high, and may remain so over the next few months.

At Promethean we view the production of biodiesel first and foremost as a service. This view means that we must constantly explore ways to add value to our customers as well as reduce the costs related to production. Focusing on manufacturing as a service has other consequents as well, some yet to be discovered.

As it stands, an increased level of vertical integration is required in our collection approach and infrastructure, since it is obvious that without the ability to obtain some percentage of the feedstock required for production we cannot sustain-ably render our services in the long term.

Problems are opportunities, and the feedstock problem for a plant of our scale is easily solved with hard work, a commitment to service, and time.

Make it a better place!

Todd

Signs of maturity.

January 31st, 2010

This weekend a bunch of people volunteered to help us modernize the office. Tasks included removing carpet that had been glued down in the late 70’s or early 80’s, removing ceiling tiles to expose the bare bones of the ceiling rafters, as well as removing various wires left  over from projects both strange and mysterious.

It was incredible to see everyone working together, young and old, lending hearts and hands to help.

I may not have mentioned this before, but I am a new to the area, and have spent a good deal of time trying to make friends and influence people.

So much time is spent on plant building and making improvements that a “beautification” project on the front office seemed to me a really low priority before we started. But as we worked together throughout the day, hauling out carpet remnants, scraping glue off the floor, and stacking ceiling tiles, I began to realize how important this event was as a symbol of growth and as a step toward maturing the cooperative.

Of course, when we started the project it seemed pretty straightforward. We still have a good deal of work left to do, including scraping glue and painting walls.

At least the hardest part is over; convincing me that this was something worth doing I believe will really pay off.

Make it a better place!

Todd

The first post of the new year!

January 13th, 2010

2010. A new year. Almost everything seems possible; everything except the passage of the biodiesel blenders credit renewal.

Everyone I have spoken to seems certain that the credit will be reinstated in a retroactive fashion. I’m pretty certain.

In an interview published in the Wisconsin Ag Connection Michael Frohlich, the NBB’s Director of Federal Communication, was quoted as saying “Pretty much every plant is idle.”

Strangely enough, things do not feel very idle at Promethean. I believe the same may be true for the majority of small poducers I have spoken to.

Oil prices seem to have remained steady.

The big news is related to RFS2. I called the EPA on Monday in the hopes of getting an updated status on the progress of the rulemaking as well as some sort of advanced information on what may be included that would interest the biodiesel industry. I received nothing more than a statement that sounded pre-canned saying that the rules would be out soon. The rest was classified, or as close to classified as the EPA gets.

RFS2 is potentially an industry game-changer. Optimistic estimates place final rule implementation sometime in the Spring of 2010.

We have been working on MRU’s (Methanol Recovery Units) this month, primarily on design/build projects for other plants.

Strangely enough I almost always fall in love with the things we build, and really hate seeing them go into service somewhere else. So much time and energy goes into the design and fabrication, and we view our equipment not only in the sense of its utility and efficiency of performing its function but also as a quasi-artistic endeavor and the opportunity to demonstrate good old-fashioned American ingenuity.

This year, with all its promise, may be more challenging for the biodiesel industry than the last.

RFS 2 will bring new compliance challenges, and organizations will need to adapt their business processes appropriately. Lack of a tax credit may make it difficult for existing producers to maintain profitability, or maintain staffing levels. It may alos be an opportunity for new entrants to carve out a niche in makets that may have been dominated by large but credit dependent competitors.

Only time will tell.

Make it a better place!

Todd

Senate Delays 2010 Biodiesel Tax Credit Extension Vote

December 19th, 2009

The New York Times report issued on December 18th does more than suggest a delay of the Senate taking on the tax credit extension, tabling the matter until some time next year.

If not approved this year, the earliest the Senate can calendar this item would be the middle of January.

The full article can be found here.

It remains to be seen how a credit delay will affect the industry. The portents of doom and gloom abound for larger producers according to the NBB.

The truth remains to be seen.

Make it a better place,

Todd

House passes 2010 biodiesel tax credit. What now?

December 13th, 2009

I believe most of you reading this are already aware that the House passed H.R. 4213, a tax extension package that included a 1 year extension of the biodiesel tax credit for blenders.

It is now a near certainty that S.1589 and H.R. 4070 will not be voted on this year, which is unfortunate since these legislative initiatives included a 5-year producer credit mandate which would be a tremendous positive for producers and an aggressive move towards stabilizing the industry.

Although H.R. 4213 easily passed the House (with a vote of 241 yeas to 181 nays), it is still possible that the legislation will not pass the Senate this year. As of today, the current Senate calendar is only updated to the 14th of December. With the health bill the current top priority, it is quite possible that the extension provisions will not be heard and addressed until early January 2010.

The bill has been referred to the Senate Committee on Finance, where it will ostensibly determined what the net economic effect of the bill passage would be.

Make it a better place,

Todd

Promethean wins ‘green’ award

December 6th, 2009

Promethean joined in excess of 250 California businesses and nonprofits recognized for their “innovative, environmentally friendly programs and policies” named as recipients of the 2009 Waste Reduction Awards Program, also known as the WRAP Award.

The California Integrated Waste Management Board issued news release stated that, “This year’s honorees have diverted more than 2 million tons of materials annually from local landfills… and their… efforts have improved their balance sheets through savings of $150 million in operating costs.”

Other prominent recipients include Mercedes Benz USA, BAE Systems Controls, Cardinal Health, Robert Bosch, and Toyota Motor Sales.

Matt Wrye writes for The Bizz blog. His post can be found here:

Some thoughts on the passing year and the year ahead.

November 28th, 2009

On a recent trip to the north of Mexico I was asked to speak to a group of businessmen and governmental leaders about the opportunities that exist in latin America to create and mature a biofuels industry. I had developed a short version of a much longer presentation to discuss with them the various lessons that the United States had to offer in its recent attempts to support a sustainable, national, biofuels sector.

I was scheduled to speak for a mere 45 minute but, by the time I was forced to end the discussion to make a scheduled flight leaving that afternoon, nearly 3 hours had passed.

A large portion of my talk had centered on what I affectionately call the American Biofuels Fiasco. As most in the biofuels sector can tell you, for the majority of producers, distributors, and marketers, things in the last two years have not gone acording to plan.

There are many reasons the sector has struggled , some forseeable, some not so, but all agree that uncertainty around congressional renewal of the credit subsidy has been a contributing factor in deterring investment in new and existing projects, feedstock limitations will continue to be an industry concern, and many facilities built have capacities far in excess of their hopes to secure adequate capital or feedstock to run efficiently.

The next year will likely bring new models to production, some changes to production technology emphases, and hopefully changes to the longevity of credit subsidies. These are all good things.

But most importantly the next year provides those of us still standing with the opportunity to implement changes to the way we do things based upon the lessons learned and wisdom gained from the past year.

For those of us at Promethean this past year has flown. The lessons have been plentiful, and some have come harder than others.

Small is better; wherever you plan to place a 90 you’re better off with a ‘T’; you can’t build a plant that is dependant upon subsidies for its continued operation; good interns are a precious gift (and difficult to find); most quality problems can be solved economically.

The list goes on.

For all of you industry insiders out there I wish all of you the best of luck and much success in the coming year.

Make it a better place!

Todd